?

Log in

No account? Create an account
March 2018   01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NF-Lee's Gildor and Frodo

2007 LotR Calendar Scans….

Posted on 2007.06.02 at 11:55

Comments:


pearlette
pearlette at 2007-06-02 20:07 (UTC) (Link)
Black-and-white Fro!

I have that. Plus a teeny-tiny version which a friend sent me, now in a silver frame.

They're so marvellous, these art prints. Everybody looks fabulous (I swoon for Galadriel's exquisite satin cloak!) ... everybody apart from poor Arwen, whose face looks too long and thin. Not the most flattering portrait of Liv, I have to say. A shame because she usually looks gorgeous as Arwen. That shot doesn't do her justice.

Sam (sexeh!) and Boromir (phwooooaaarr!) are my runner-up faves ...

but Black-and-White Fro reigns supreme!!

Do notice the two sides of his face, and how the two together make up the irresistable whole: the left side, all creamy and pure, is Innocent Fro, the right side, shadowed and sexy, is Devilish Fro. Wonderfully shot, cleverly lit: it makes for an utterly alluring portrait. That Master Baggins is smokin', baby, smokin'. :D
Mechtild
mechtild at 2007-06-02 23:53 (UTC) (Link)
Do notice the two sides of his face, and how the two together make up the irresistable whole: the left side, all creamy and pure, is Innocent Fro, the right side, shadowed and sexy, is Devilish Fro.

You know, Pearl, except in colour (in which, it turned out, the colour was fake anyway), I didn't really respond to this Frodo portrait. In its large, detailed version, I do. But I didn't know why I still found it unsettling, as if it were a portrait of someone else. I think you have put your finger on it. Tairie (who is an artist) was the first to point out to me how very different the two sides of EW's (and thus Frodo's) face are, particularly his eyes. She thought it added to his intriguing appeal. The lighting, as you point out, does a lot here.

I followed your lead and covered first one side and then the other with my hand. Good heavens, what a difference! You are so on target! The left side has a very mild, beneficent look; the right, an intense look, which fans can interpret as Ring-Frodo--or sex-Frodo--perhaps they are the same thing (*g*). Anyway, wow.

I can't agree on Arwen. Yes her face is too long--Liv Tyler's face is too long for how wide it is, that is true. Her straight-on shots are usually not that good unless she is shot from above (foreshortening the lower part of her face), of if her close-ups are so close they concentrate on her huge, fathomless eyes, high brow, and full mouth, cutting off her chin at a point that conceals the length of her face. But it is not that her face is too long, but too narrow. If she had the same length face but a wider face, it would all be in proportion. Her profile shots are all EXQUISITE.
Mechtild
mechtild at 2007-06-03 17:07 (UTC) (Link)
Hey, Pearl, scroll down and open Melyanna's second comment. She's got some photos of prints that came with her Empire magazine that had these portraits. Look at the Arwen (and Legolas) -- I think the image of Arwen greatly improved with the rest of her torso included. And what great costume detail for both of them!
Previous Entry  Next Entry