?

Log in

No account? Create an account
March 2018   01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NF-Lee's Gildor and Frodo

Fearturing Bandwench's Frodo manip ~ "Frodo: Study in Blue" (Adult)....

Posted on 2006.06.25 at 12:41

Comments:


Shirebound
shirebound at 2006-06-25 22:58 (UTC) (Link)
I only feel brave enough to view "Tame" at the moment, but that "Prince Elijah" is astonishing. Incredible.
Mechtild
mechtild at 2006-06-25 23:37 (UTC) (Link)
Isn't "Prince Elijah" FABULOUS?????

It makes me wish all the more he would do another film in which he could wear a great costume and wig. I know a lot of his fans like him no matter what he is sporting. But I dislike most of his bed head hair-dos, and don't like his shaved look much better. I hate and despise the "Faux-hawk". But, other fans love these looks. I just wish he'd do something to please an old long-hair-loving geezer like me. You don't see me sticking him into paintings featuring bald men, do you?

I also love his beautiful speech as Frodo, which goes out the window when he is playing modern roles.

As for "Tempting," that may be too much for you, Shirebound. Bandwench has put a lot of images in there that I would call "R" for sure - ones with testicles visible, for example. The pictures from which these are made, when they are nude, are not actually involved in a sexual situation, so they have been put into "Tempting" rather than "Torrid." But, they still are posed in ways that clearly were meant to be sexually titillating, even if they aren't highly-rated.

If I post a "Michelangelo's David", in which the statue's genitals are fully on view, I say, "NOT WORK SAFE", because, even if he's a statue, he's fully naked. But, I wouldn't call the piece "NC-17" or even "R", because the image was not meant to be erotic. It's just a man naked. But the source pics used for most of "Tempting", and some of "Tame", are meant to be pin-ups. I think that changes the character of the manips, even if they are not explicit.

So, you may not want to click open "Tempting." However, Bandwench often is quite straight about what you'll see, when it comes to literal presentation. If she says "partial view of boy bits", that means you are going to see some testicle. If she says, "veiled, aroused boy bits" (or somthing like that), it means you will clearly be able to see that the model has an erection, but through underwear or something like that.

In "Torrid," you will see something quite different. If she says, "aroused boy bits," it means there is going to be an erect penis in full view. If she adds, "self-touching", it means the model ir, or appears to be masturbating.

I should imagine the same criteria will apply when she gets her "Het" and "Slash" galleries up (which mean EW will be with a partner).
Shirebound
shirebound at 2006-06-25 23:42 (UTC) (Link)
But I dislike most of his bed head hair-dos, and don't like his shaved look much better. I hate and despise the "Faux-hawk". But, other fans love these looks. I just wish he'd do something to please an old long-hair-loving geezer like me.

I couldn't agree more!!!!

And thank you for all the information. You manip folks are so incredibly gifted.
Mechtild
mechtild at 2006-06-26 00:01 (UTC) (Link)
I've seen your picture recently, from your latest fan get-together. You are NOT an old geezer, rather, a petite Young Thing. Yet, you still love the Long Hair of Yore???? *hugs*
Mechtild
mechtild at 2006-06-25 23:41 (UTC) (Link)
I just looked at what I wrote, Shirebound.

I sure do talk a lot!

(Did you ever look at the one I made this post for? Really, it is not sleazy. It's quite lovely.)
Shirebound
shirebound at 2006-06-25 23:47 (UTC) (Link)
I sure do talk a lot!

I love your passion and how wonderfully and fully you communicate. Please don't ever start censoring yourself!
Mechtild
mechtild at 2006-06-26 00:04 (UTC) (Link)
Well, I do try and suit what I say to my audience. But ever since I became a mother (18 years ago), I elected to remove obscenities from my speech. I intend to keep that up, although I am able to quote the obscenities of others, for whom this is not an issue, using asterisks, so as not to offend those who don't wish to see the full quote (like putting "x"s on nipples).

I don't censor myself as to topics, however. That is wide-open.
Previous Entry  Next Entry